planets= electrons?

**Hero of Time** · 06-03-2006, 08:19 AM

ok I made this thread in ZU( zelda universe)too a few moths ago and they locked it because it was to complicated. so here it goes.it's something I've been thinking for many years but I still don't know what the answer is, maybe I never will know. Now to the point, I was thinking: electrons are some kind of spheres that travels around a atomic nucleus. This forms a atom. Now, billions of atoms is one molecule. Now, molecules together forms a DNA(correct me if I'm wrong). Know , I was thinking: our planet is also a sphere and other planets to, and they also travel around a atomic nucleus(the sun). this whole thing that we call is a solar sytem (atom). So maybe we also live in a atom and I think the molecule is the so called milkyway and the whole galaxy can be found in a DNA. so that could mean it's so infinite that there's no end or a beginning. What are you're thoughts?(it's just a theory). I know it's to complicated but think about it.

Here is my othere post I made in thesame thread, just read it, I know it's a lot. everyone!!!
I agree that our planet isn't a perfect sphere, but who says that electrons are. Scientists don't have high high high high tech microscope to explore the whole atom. they are only able to see a few spheres spinning around a big sphere that 's all. I just thought of that because I saw and read and learned in school that electrons spin around a atomic nucleus, and that happens also in our solar system. So I think they maybe have a connection between each other, you can say that a atom is a mini mini mini mini solar system. Ok like I said Scientists don't have high high high high tech microscope to explore the whole atom or a electron, so they can't see if there's a moon or something. And you say our planet has some satellites. Ok maybe they don't have satellites like us because ther aren't that civilized or maybe they are but we can't see it, because we aren't that intelligent to see that. Ok, maybe I have made some mistakes with the details that I gave you in my thread, sorry about that. Know about the subject:"so that could mean it's so infinite that there's no end or a beginning": Ok I want to explain something about this subject. You guys say if there's a beginning then there's a end. I agree with that to. But if my theory does make sence then it's impossible that there is a beginning or a end. Can you guys tell me where the beginning of the galaxy start's. everyone will say the big bang(duh). But what is the orgin of the big bang? How did the orgin of the big bang exist? what's the cause of it? how did the orgin of the cause exist? it's infinite, I must say. And I'm really sure that we never are going to get the answer to these questions.

this is just like in the movie from men and black:

At the end of the film the shot shows the earth in its solar system amoung millions of others, and they are all compacted into just one little marble of another life!

I thought I make this thread, to discuss a bit about everything.

**Neo Zelda** · 06-03-2006, 03:54 PM

so what your trying to say is that the things we consider to be the simplest life on earth (atoms, molecules, etc.) could also be solar systems such as we have? And that we may be a molecule to some larger form of life?

**Hero of Time** · 06-03-2006, 04:11 PM

yes. And that the molecules in our for example hair has microscopic life too.

Tinkleheimer · 06-03-2006, 04:40 PM

I have been thinking of something along the lines of this also

**Hero of Time** · 06-06-2006, 04:50 PM

I knew this thread would be to complicated for the members.

**Hero of Time** · 06-07-2006, 05:39 PM

*moved to intelligent discussion.*

**Mar** · 06-07-2006, 06:47 PM

I believe that the way the electrons move around the atom is a prime example of the way life moves. I once thought that too, but the reason why the plants orbit around the sun is similar to why electrons orbit around the protons and neutrons.

Everything is made of atoms and atoms are combined by attracting each other. The way the plants move around the earth is also by them being attracted to each other. So, it's extremely similar and amazing. But when you get down to the science of it they're completley different things and are attracted for similar reasons, but in a different way.

It is interesting how you can compare the solar system to the basics of life. The simplest of all forums: the atom.

**daemonsage420** · 06-07-2006, 08:10 PM

I admire the intricacy of your theory. It leads me to ask if you've ever heard of Drake's Equation.

The Drake equation states that:

N = R* x Fp x Ne x Fl x Fi x Fc x L

where:

N is the number of civilizations in our galaxy with which we might expect to be able to communicate at any given time

and

R* is the rate of star formation in our galaxy
Fp is the fraction of those stars which have planets
Ne is average number of planets which can potentially support life per star that has planets
Fl is the fraction of the above which actually go on to develop life
Fi is the fraction of the above which actually go on to develop intelligent life
Fc is the fraction of the above which are willing and able to communicate
L is the expected lifetime of such a civilization

Quite interesting. When used in conjunction with your theory there could be an infinite number of civilizations of which we are just one part of, and could in fact be the "most basic component" to another civilization when we in fact have more simplistic beings other than ourselves. Quite interesting, indeed.

**Hero of Time** · 06-07-2006, 08:32 PM

wow, I never heard of Drake's Equation, but it sure is interesting. thanks for the info deamon. It's just weird how things actually have started. It's so infinite. even our whole body exist of millions of atoms that may have civilizations. So if I burn one piece of my hair, then I just destroyed a civilization. fascinating.

**daemonsage420** · 06-07-2006, 08:43 PM

Quite so. There are unlimited possibilities as to what caused what to happen and what didn't. And who's to say what is fact and what is fiction? The variation in theories of how things arrived at the present day show how little we actually know. Some are more probable than others but that doesn't prove the possibility that the one is what really happened and the other is just a theory. It also doesn't disprove that one isn't what happened nor that both weren't actually components involved in the formula that bred life into our planet and ourselves. I think I'll stop. Too much philosophy.

**Hero of Time** · 06-07-2006, 08:52 PM

hahhah, I like philosophy very much. I'm a complicated person you now. I always think about things to make sence and I really like to think alot and I don't know why. My parents say if we think to much then we go like grazy. but that doesn't seem to happen with me. That's why I made this thread about these things to share it other so called complicated members too.

**daemonsage420** · 06-07-2006, 09:04 PM

I'm not really so much complicated as I am crazy. But my intellignce goes well with my "craziness" I just think about things more than most people do and I usually arrive at a feasible solution. It's pretty awesome.

**Hero of Time** · 06-07-2006, 09:08 PM

Ya, I'm quit thesame as you. wow, it's just weird, nobody has said that my theory is impossible here at GL. In zelda universe they all were acting tough and saying I'm wrong and they're right. *sheesh*

06-07-2006, 10:43 PM	#14
daemonsage420 Dominique Reano Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Grants, NM Age: 20 Posts: 207 Level: 13 [